Past student evaluations

Past Student Evaluations

Charles Level 2- One of the weaknesses of his evaluation is his use of technology programming for each question. The fact that he used bubbl as his technology for question 1 meant that he limited his options as he wouldn't be able to add any screen grabs or images and given that question 1 is one of the longer questions this is a mistake that we will definitely try to avoid. One of the strengths of his evaluation is that he has managed to use a different form of technology for each question, despite using a blog post for question 7.

Molly Level 4- This groups evaluation is done to a really good standard, they have used a variety of different technologies for the right questions and have managed to put thorough detail into all of the questions. They also ensured most of their questions were easy to navigate and were visually interesting by including features such as images screen grabs to back up what they were talking about. This is an evaluation that we will definitely be taking guidance from.

Joe Level 3- Whilst this group do manage to use a variety of technologies, a lot of the questions lack a response detailed enough to gain a level 4, particularly the longer questions such as question 1. One other positive of this groups evaluation is that they do make it interesting to read by using lots of images, backgrounds etc which we will be looking to implement within our evaluation to make sure its interesting for the viewer to read.